Sign up for VMSPACE, Korea's best architecture online magazine.

Login Join


Amorepacific Headquarters

David Chipperfield Architects

written by
Lim Sunghun (professor, Tongmyong University)
materials provided by
Amorepacific, David Chipperfield Architects
background

A Building of Serenity

David Chipperfield (principal, David Chipperfield Architects) ¡¿ SPACE

 

​SPACE: How did you cope with the issues presented by the Yongsan area?
David Chipperfield (Chipperfield): We focused on two issues: how to make a building that can improve the urban scape and also how to make a building that can better demonstrate the philosophy of Amorepacific. The surroundings of the Yongsan area have transformed very quickly. At the beginning stage of the project we were not sure how the surroundings would change, but we could guess that it would have more high-rise buildings at a later stage. When Yongsan Park is completed in the future, this building¡¯s entrance will serve as a gate connecting the city to the park and will extend the role of the park further.
We considered the issue of aesthetic standards for the new headquarters of a beauty company, Amorepacific. We think that a building of calmness can stand out well against the many high-rise buildings of the noisy Yongsan area. Korea¡¯s Moon Jar provided us with a motive of moderate beauty. The white porcelain has a restrained beauty, but its presence is powerful. Of course, we didn¡¯t borrow the form of Moon Jar directly. It is rather closer to the idea we pursued. In a discussion with Suh Kyungbae (CEO, Amorepacific) about the starting points of the project, the white porcelain
provided a basis for guaging a consensus around ¡®the definition of beauty that we pursue¡¯.​ 
 

 

SPACE: The new Amorepacific headquarters is a huge cube. What are the pros of this form?
Chipperfield: Spaces can meet various roles and purposes. A headquarters will do better if it can serve as a community space for public communication, with various programmes such as restaurants and childcare facilities. I thought that cube would be appropriate for creating such a multipurpose space. We divided this gargantuan space, covering 2,000m2, into smaller spaces to meet various purposes. I think that everyone will want to split the huge scale of the cubic building into fragments. Our aim was to turn it into smaller​ scale which is easy to perceive by adopting louvers, the fourstep volume expansion and openings.

SPACE: This building has a spacious atrium on the first floor. What is the intended purpose of this atrium, which provides a free space for the public? 
Chipperfield: Atrium is usually a space of public purposes. Opened to all directions, the atrium attracts people naturally into the public space. I think that it can be used not only for the employees but also for the local people, and it is a space with great potential to meet various functions such as events and cultural exchanges. Because lifestyles change as our society develops, hardware should always be ready to flexibly respond and cope with change. In the meantime, it must have durability that can withstand the changing times. The atrium is an independent space and has nothing to do
with the performance of the company, but it is flexible space. I think by having this kind of space, it can make the building itself a permanent and universal alternative and remain as a social space for the public.​ 

  

 

Atrium is usually a space of public purposes. Opened to all directions, the atrium attracts people naturally into the public space.


The glazed floor of the courtyard invites a diffuse, natural light into the most important public space of the building, the atrium.

 

SPACE: What is the intended purpose of louvers in this building, in the sense of form and function?

Chipperfield: In fact, it is extremely difficult to express the weight of glass buildings such as the new Amorepacific headquarters. Louvers that act like folding screens help to disclose a sense of  weight. Depth and light details are added to the exterior. Excessive heat gain in glass buildings can be reduced thanks to using aluminum louvers that prevent the glare of direct sunlight and reduce the heat load by shading the building. Matt-finished louvers enhance diffuse reflection and increase the quality and quantity of daylight entering the interior. The aerodynamic profile of the fins has been optimized to eliminate vibration and wind generated noise. 

 

SPACE: What is the role of the courtyard? 

Chipperfield: Fascinated by the hanok, which has the characteristics of a loggia that is open and private, I adopted its principles in the design of the roof garden. Breathing closer to nature and feeling the changing seasons, workers in the building can communicate and relax comfortably. Three large urban openings are well connected with the exterior surroundings, providing views over the city and the mountains in the distance and therefore establishing a sense of orientation and belonging. In other words, they are windows and frames that mediate between the company and the city.​

 

-

 

Architecture: A Beauty

Lim Sunghun (professor, Tongmyong University)

 

Although the DDP and Tower Palace have failed, one building in Busan has succeeded in attracting people's attention, ¡®I¡¯PARK¡¯ near the beach of Haeundae. On his visit to Busan, Daniel Libeskind said that he thinks that he has found what people in Busan want. Cutting a ball in several ways, as he has done in his works, he has created a shape that satisfies their desire. This presented dream apartments for Busan¡¯s people with a unique view of the old small harbour with a decent high-rise building to the visitors to Busan. He created a building that evokes people¡¯s desires. The ¡®Amorepacific¡¯ Headquarters, like the I¡¯PARK building, is an issue not only for the architectural community but also members of the public. It is easy to find people saying on SNS that the building is marvelous in many ways, from its external appearance to the restaurants in the basement, and that they want to get a job in the company. The reason is simple: it is pretty and attractive. From the perspective of a design competition, ¡®beauty¡¯ played a central role in this project. More emphasis was placed on the issue of beauty than architectural solution until the end of the project.​

 

Then what makes it beautiful? First, it was made in the shape of a mass. David Chipperfield likened this building to a white porcelain form known as a ¡®Moon Jar¡¯. They share some common factors. The white porcelain was so large that it had to be made in two parts and combined later, which is seemingly in line with his aspiration. Making all facades uniform and sticking them closely together, he made a lump. Coincidentally he didn¡¯t connect the concrete mass of the escalator in the hall with the concrete slab in a smooth way. Although different materials and colours were used in the ceilings, walls, and floors, the use of sparkling lights has created a coherent atmosphere. This applies to the external appearance. The surface-treated aluminum louvers have been attached unevenly and different in size, but they make a consistent surface when they are well lit by sunshine, creating a continuous mass. The horizontal articulation also contributes to emphasizing the presence

of a mass. Increasing the size slightly in the upper part, the mass delivers the impression that the different masses are firmly piled up.​

 

Increasing the size slightly in the upper part, the mass edlivers the impression that the different masses are firmly piled up.

  

The Headquarters building is beautiful. It seems firm and unchanging, but it varies depending on the light conditions. The hall on the ground floor appears different when it is lit by the skylight and when it is lit by artificial lighting in the evening. The external appearance created by the louvers also varies when they are lit by strong sunlight and when it is cloudy. Of course, it seems different when it is lit at night. As the beauty of white porcelain is said to lie in its earthy qualities, rather than as pure white, the building changes in its appearance a bit.

 

Beauty is different from an idea of the pretty. When we call a thing beautiful, we require a consensus. This requires at least two things, that the object must prompt different images or impressions, like the everchanging sky which will move us more at certain times than others, and it must evoke something in our minds. Jean-Luc Nancy calls this desire. Beauty can work by revealing a ¡®truth summoned and directed by desires that we can¡¯t control¡¯. We may conceal a different instinct, one that we don¡¯t believe to be valid, but when we interrogate, question and look at the mind, and realise that it is true, we call the activator beauty. When it evokes our hidden desires and make us recognise them, we begin to pay attention to it, and this eventually makes us sense beauty.​

A free-standing building. Chipperfield said that he had a lot of troubles because the surrounding environment is changing so fast, but it is hard to find ¡®the Chipperfield¡¯ who tries to make architecture take a step backward rather than stand out in the city. Amorepacific¡¯s claim to ¡®connect people with others, buildings, and the local community¡¯ doesn¡¯t stand to reason at all. The building has managed to connect people, but this doesn¡¯t mean a connection to its neighbours as a space in a city. The building is pulling together people¡¯s desires for a pleasing appearance and an aspiration to be beautiful instead of being connected to something or somewhere. It is drawing people¡¯s attention to thinking about how beauty works. Even the means of connecting the restaurants in the basement to the hall naturally contributes to inflaming such a desire. ​

 

​​

Fascinated by the hanok, which has the characteristics of a loggia that is open and private, the architects adopted its principles in the design of the roof garden.

 

Then, if the beauty of Amorepacific Headquarters comes from desire when we regard it as beautiful, what does that desire mean?
Just as Libeskind read what people wanted, David Chipperfield, project architect of Amorepacific building, saw through the requirements of his client. Amorepacific must have sought to make a beautiful building that would be aloof from others, and to build an image of a company that produces beauty.

This building is likely to become a successful project with many visitors, but I don¡¯t like either Libeskind¡¯s attitude or Chipperfield¡¯s, even if it is more ¡®architectural¡¯. I may feel uncomfortable as he sees through us too accurately. It is more so because I can¡¯t deny that it is a nice work. Not only the design of external appearance and interior, but also the landscape of water and trees on the rooftop of the fourth floor is extremely delicate. Even the choice of individual tree and the detail of soil and stone are carefully designed. The water in the shallow glass pond can be enjoyed in winter through the heated water and heaters installed at the corners. I am wondering how it will look when it snows in winter.​

I was deeply impressed by his attempts to use a limited range of materials to make the building consistent in its aspect and also by his delicate skill in dealing with the detail to make all the pieces act as one. My first disappointment in the building on a cloudy day made me regard the building as more beautiful as it turned into my impression in a sunny day. The feeling of each surface was also agreeable. It was more amazing because the feeling came from not the ¡®surface of the material¡¯ but the ¡®surface of architecture¡¯ created in the combination of various materials. But this is regrettable as it arose from an effort to create a freestanding beauty rather than to play a useful social role. 

I wonder whether I would feel more comfortable if beauty​ worked like white porcelain, a traditional beauty that unfolds all the memories of life. The proportion of the mass looks oriental, but it is not traditional or Korean, and in a similar way the rooftop landscaping on the fourth floor may seem like irregular curves floating on the water but also appear like a curve around large stones in the Japanese landscape. I think, if it is intended to stand alone, it would be better, at the very past, to find a connection point with the past. Am I just making a worn-out complaint yearning for Korean tradition?

 

It still leaves some questions. After the candle revolution, we discussed the problems facing our society. Now we must start discussions about architecture. What kind of methods should be adopted to make architecture beautiful? This prompts a further question, is this building created by Chipperfield good or bad?​

 

 

 ​ 

Architect

David Chipperfield Architects (Berlin)

Location

100, Hangang-daero, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea

Programme

mixed use (office building, museum, etc.)

Site area

14,500m©÷

Building area

8,700m©÷

Gross floor area

216,000m©÷

Building scope

B7, 23F

Parking

680

Height

110m

Building to land ratio

60%

Floor area ratio

848%

Structure

Arup Deutschland GmbH, CSSE, Seoul

Exterior finishing

Hyundai Engineering & Construction, Seoul

Interior finishing

KESSON, Seoul

Structural engineer

Arup Deutschland GmbH, CSSE, Seoul

Mechanical and electrical engineer

Arup Deutschland GmbH, CSSE, Seoul

Construction

Hyundai Engineering & Construction, Seoul

Design period

2010 – 2014

Construction period

2014 – 2017

Client

Amorepacific Corporation, Seoul​

Landscape design

SeoAhn, Seoul

Supervision

Kunwon Engineering Co. Ltd.,Seoul

Overall project management

Hans Krause / Nicolas Kulemeyer, Thomas Pyschny

Partners (Design lead)

Design lead – David Chipperfield, Christoph

Contact architect

HAEAHN Architecture, Seoul


David Chipperfield Architects
Since its foundation in 1985, David Chipperfield Architects has developed a diverse international body of work including cultural, residential, commercial, leisure and civic projects, as well as masterplanning exercises. Within the its portfolio of museums and galleries, projects range from private collections such as the Museo Jumex in Mexico City to public institutions such as the revitalised Neues Museum in Berlin. The practices in London, Berlin, Milan and Shanghai, contribute to a wide range of projects and typologies.

COMMENTS