Sign up for VMSPACE, Korea's best architecture online magazine.

Login Join


DAN

Leehong Kim Architects

written by
Nam Soohyoun (professor, Myongji University)
photographed by
Kyungsub Shin
materials provided by
Leehong Kim Architects
background

Positioning in Introverted Space 

 

A long while ago I heard an interesting story from an Australian architect. Building law underwent change whenever a new building designed by Wolf D. Prix (principal, Coop Himmelb(l)au)—the well-known architectural firm in Korea for designing Busan Cinema Center—was built in Vienna, Austria. On one occasion, Wolf Prix used a water tank to form a pointed shape in order to bypass the building codes in Austria, but then the building law changed so that even a supplementary system of architecture cannot have such a radical form.

Unless an amply sized site is possible, we are bound to work within a volume specified by building law. An architect¡¯s design is completed within these specified limitations through negotiation with the building codes. The architect designed a building by cutting the mass from an ideal hexahedral shape. He minimized other elements to draw more attention to this cutout. Most buildings face a conflict between building codes and the design during the initial design process, often eventually causing a certain necessary loss to the design. However, DAN, designed by Kim Leehong, combats this by naturally integrating the disadvantages of a narrow site and the difficulties of piloti parking and a sloping topology into the design, smoothly and flexibly developing the design. If the method of removing a certain part from this ideal cuboid volume is considered as a design strategy in response to the restrictions imposed by building codes and other regulating factors, then the issue that becomes most pertinent is what impact compositional methods have on the spatial experience of the resulting works of architecture.

The first impact is that the narrative of the space is obtained from the architectural style, which is not so large in size and that requires an inherent repetition of stacking. The architect accepts the conditions of the sloped road facing the site and the right to light clause that has to be guaranteed on the right side, creating the following path: once you climb up two-thirds of a level on the left – when seen from the front elevation, the circulation path shifts through the first floor¡¯s outdoor hall and the deck; then the stair is planned along the property line of the site¡¯s right side, leading the journey to the third floor. This outdoor hall, which was designed for the separate use of the first and the second floors in the future, took into account the overall connection to the office located on the upper level. However, it is also a very effective means of devising a prototype applicable to a general neighbourhood residential building. This is an optimistic design approach, where the most crucial outdoor space is not occupied only by the occupant in the corresponding level, but also promotes the natural encounter of the occupants of the whole floors.

The second impact is the space¡¯s diverse opening, which was carried out during this process of ascending. It gives considerable inspiration to those determined to experience a space, in aspects such as, high floor heights and the void of the outdoor hall seen when entered from the roadside; the open view towards the deck on the third floor; the closed view of the hanging wall; the profound sense of space from the first floor connecting to the second and the third floors; and a classical space strategy of looking back at the path that one just took when arriving at the deck on the third floor. The path of ascending the space—which is not directly connected—is completed through the interior stairs connecting the third and the fourth, and the fourth and the fifth floors. The two experiences that are just described are combined, and the exterior staircase becomes a loop tying all the levels together. Often implying a deconstruction of the core, this is closely related to the structural theme that Japanese and Korean architects apply throughout small-scale buildings. However, if the connection with the exterior staircase found in the projects of the past have emphasised continuity with the roads outside, DAN pays closer attention to a circulation path that relates to the interior programme and the diverse relationships between the exterior and interior.

 

The architect combats the disadvantages of a narrow site and the difficulties of piloti parking and a sloping topology by naturally integrating those into the design, smoothly and flexibly developing the design.

 

The Means of Accepting a Context

The base plane includes a parking lot at the lower part of the cuboid at which this volume is manipulated and expressed in a different manner. This base plane is the only part where the exposed concrete is used in the actual construction, and it is clearly distinguished from the upper part of the building. This is the part that is facing the ground, which is closely in contact with its surroundings. So the exposed concrete finishing retains a sense of rawness, rather than a smooth finish, which blends well with the old houses nearby and helps to assimilate DAN into this area. The tile finishing has also been applied only on the front side of the four sides of the building, and the surfaces on the longitudinal direction adjacent to the other sites are finished with stucco. These choices indicate that the overall design of the building took the texture of the surrounding environment into account. This method of composition, which can be seen from Kim Leehong¡¯s previous project, Cornerstone 1 – 532 (covered in SPACE, issue 577), depicts an ¡®ideal form¡¯ as a pure sculpture on the upper part, and the lower part is interpreted as a dichotomous composition pursuing a ¡®harmony with reality¡¯ in response to the site condition. In a certain way, it is similar to the podium composition of the classical architecture. This configuration is an important motif in the design of both buildings. Yet, if it was applied only as a degree of implying a context in Cornerstone, its relationship is much clearer in DAN – dominating the overall design. This configuration is an important motif in the design of both buildings. In advance of interacting with the building codes, architecture performs an important exchange with aesthetics.
  

 

The variety of openings in the space involved in rising the DAN has considerable appeal to those who experience space. 

 

Shape, Mass, Quintessence

In this dichotomous composition, the distinction between the two elements is bound to be one of contrast. The base plane part, which requires a harmony with reality, exhibits an open shape. Whereas, in contrast, the ideal form part exhibits a character of enclosure. Thus, in such​ configuration, the elevation of the upper part has to be designed as immanently ¡®lacking¡¯ in visual interaction. Therefore, it is meaningless to criticize the lack of interaction with the outside, because is a condition already included in the composition itself. Rather, what this project recalls is a certain preference of some architects, including myself, for this mode. Most architects use a method of emphasizing the appealing weight of the mass, and therefore the openings naturally shrink in design. If this sense of being enclosed was not commonly seen, the issue would not have been considered a subject of criticism in DAN. As a consequence it reveals our sense of aesthetics towards ¡®architecture that is architectural¡¯.
It is natural for an architect who has faith in architecture to pursue a quintessential design ideal. Just as building codes have made today¡¯s architecture, the quintessence of architecture create a next phase of architecture and even a change in building codes. However, we have seen a lot of high-end brand buildings that purse the sense of being enclosed – an extremely introverted elevation. Now the novelty of such formative methods have gone, and it is necessary to reconsider where our position should stand.
The architect Kim Leehong is quite relaxed: when I was interviewing him, I felt that, compared to a more sensitive person like myself, he had an admirable tolerance of the suggestion that his construction methods or certain details could be interpreted as imperfect. The nature of this architect – who is not dogged about reaching the bitter end of each project but rather contemplatively taking long breaths as he continues working – makes us await his next project with great expectation. So I look forward to thinking about how the questions that have emerged in his previous projects will be answered in his future work.​

 

 

The rising narrative of the space is completed with three to four floors and four to five floors inside.

 

This outdoor hall, which was designed for the separate use of the first and the second floors, took into account the overall connection to the office located on the upper level.​

 

The architect designed a building by cutting the mass from an ideal hexahedral shape. He minimized other elements to draw more attention to this cutout.

 

This method of composition depicts an ¡®ideal form¡¯ as a pure sculpture on the upper part, and the lower part is interpreted as a dichotomous composition pursuing a ¡®harmony with reality¡¯ in response to the site condition.

 

Architect

Kim Leehong (Hongik University)

Design team

Kim Leehong

Location

1-137 Sinmunno 2-ga, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea

Programme

office, distribution center

Site area

311.1m2

Building area

156.69m2

Gross floor area

835.52m2

Building scope

B1, 5F

Parking

5

Height

16.86m

Building to land ratio

50.37%

Floor area ratio

195.97%

Structure

reinforced concrete

Exterior finishing

tile, stucco, exposed concrete

Interior finishing

gypsum board + paint Structural

Structural engineer

MOA & Consulting Engineers

Mechanical engineer

KS Engineering

Electrical engineer

YIGAK

Construction

GIE

Design period

Aug. 2016 – Mar. 2017

Construction period

June 2017 – May 2018

Client

314HORNET Co.,Ltd.


Kim Leehong
Kim Leehong is a principal at Leehong Kim Architects as well as an assistant professor at Hongik University. He graduated from Yonsei University and the Harvard Graduate School of Design. His work experiences include SAMOO Architects & Engineers and Steven Holl Architects. Since opening of Leehong Kim Architects, he has led various projects in both Korea and U.S. He participated in the Gwangju Design Biennale 2009 and APMAP 2016 of the Amorepacific Museum of Art, and recently received the Korean Young Architect Award 2018. He is a registered architect in New York State and a LEED accredited professional, and currently serves as a Seoul Public Architect.

COMMENTS